Kulbreez
New member
Offline
I would like to see the NFL leave fox over the latest court filings and testimonies of its personalities. This FAUX News channel needs to go away
Fox news (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Kulbreez
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
Users who are viewing this thread
MT15
Well-known member
Offline
I’m glad to see this thread, I was thinking we need it. I am seeing that Fox News has forbidden any of its on-air talent from discussing the court filings. They also refused to air an ad from a progressive organization that was merely pictures of its evening anchors with actual quotes from their own texts and emails superimposed over them. No commentary - just the quotes.
There was a new filing today, which I haven’t looked at yet:
apple.news
There was a new filing today, which I haven’t looked at yet:
New Dominion filing made public as defamation lawsuit heads to trial — Reuters
A new filing from Dominion Voting Systems became public on Monday, as an April trial approaches in the $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit brought by the voting technology company against Fox News over the U.S. cable news giant's coverage of the 2020 presidential election.
MT15
Well-known member
Offline
Fox News media analyst says network won’t let him cover Dominion lawsuit — The Washington Post
Fox News host Howard Kurtz said he has been told not to cover the $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit filed against Fox by Dominion Voting Systems.
One of the original stories:
Fox News hosts knew election conspiracy theories were false: Dominion — Business Insider
Internal messages show Fox News brass knew 2020 election fraud claims were bunk. They still tried to chase an audience fleeing to rival Newsmax, Dominion said in a court filing. A new Dominion filing revealed messages among Rupert Murdoch, Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson, and more.
coldseat
Well-known member
Offline
Does anybody know if there are any streaming or cable platforms that do not carry Fox News?
I was listening to NPR today and learned that like 90% of Fox News revenue comes from what it charges cable and streaming platforms to carry them. Only like 10% comes from advertising. That's why advertiser boycotts don't mean much to Fox News. But they charge like 2 to 3 times more than every other cable channel for the platform to carry them. And when the platforms balk over negotiations, they get their personalities involved with getting their audience to call the platforms in large numbers and complain, so that those platforms feel obligated to carry Fox News. Apparently it's incredibly effective, much more than it should be given that Fox News only has about 3 million regular viewers.
I was listening to NPR today and learned that like 90% of Fox News revenue comes from what it charges cable and streaming platforms to carry them. Only like 10% comes from advertising. That's why advertiser boycotts don't mean much to Fox News. But they charge like 2 to 3 times more than every other cable channel for the platform to carry them. And when the platforms balk over negotiations, they get their personalities involved with getting their audience to call the platforms in large numbers and complain, so that those platforms feel obligated to carry Fox News. Apparently it's incredibly effective, much more than it should be given that Fox News only has about 3 million regular viewers.
bdb13
Well-known member
Offline
Those three million viewers are more than double the viewership of their competitors in CNN and MSNBC. I think what they're charging compared to CNN and MSNBC probably isn't that crazy and probably somewhat lines up with the viewership numbers.
bdb13
Well-known member
Offline
To add, my family used to own a very small cable TV company and because of cost and demographic reasons we had CNN and MSNBC but not Fox News.
coldseat
Well-known member
Offline
But it's only about 17% of the actual cable/steaming subscribers that watch Fox News. So if a cable/steaming company went without it, they'd be fine, especially if they advertised it as the anti-propaganda provider.
The True Cost to Consumers of Pay TV’s Top Channels
Note: An extended version of this analysis is available exclusively for VIP subscribers. It’s no secret that pay TV is facing a mounting existential challenge. A record 6.2 million subscribers can…
variety.com
Last edited:
efil4
Well-known member
Offline
Apparently Murdoch, under oath, admitted that Fox hosts endorsed the "stolen election" lies knowing they were false.
Saintamaniac
Rise Sons of the Gold & Purple
Offline
SFIDC3
Well-known member
Offline
Which means (and Chuck can chime in as I could be wrong) I believe that Murdoch likely knows Dominion has demonstrable proof of this and he knows enough not to be brought up on perjury charges....
MT15
Well-known member
Offline
Fox News is alleged to have given the Trump campaign previews of Biden campaign ads before they aired. It is also alleged to have given Trump information about debate questions prior to the debate.
Here is a thread saying that these contributions were illegal, and exactly what National Enquirer got in trouble for in the case of Karen McDougal.
AMI, parent company of the Enquirer, and its officers faced criminal liability but signed plea agreements to provide cooperation in the Michael Cohen prosecution. There’s a short thread:
Here is a thread saying that these contributions were illegal, and exactly what National Enquirer got in trouble for in the case of Karen McDougal.
AMI, parent company of the Enquirer, and its officers faced criminal liability but signed plea agreements to provide cooperation in the Michael Cohen prosecution. There’s a short thread:
Optimus Prime
Well-known member
Online
For years, Democrats have been deeply conflicted about Fox News. At times, they’ve shunned the network as an irredeemable source of disinformation, boycotting it or banning it from covering Democratic presidential primary debates.
But such efforts have been temporary: They have tended to resume appearing on the network and have reverted to treating it as more or less a news channel, albeit a hostile one.
Now, however, it’s becoming clear that interacting with Fox News as a news outlet in any sense is no longer an option for Democrats.
In light of the news that network personalities knowingly deceived viewers about the 2020 election for cynical pecuniary purposes, Democrats plainly have to take on Fox News in a new way. And some of them know it.
“I don’t think we’ve ever had a moment like this, where a major news network has been exposed as deliberately deluding its viewers or readers,” Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) told me. “This is a seminal moment in the history of mass media. And we need to treat it that way.”
But what should that look like?
This week, Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries signaled an aggressive posture in a letter to Fox News founder Rupert Murdoch.
The two New York Democrats demanded that the network get star anchor Tucker Carlson and others to recant their lies about the 2020 election on the air. The letter said:
This might be the first time that the Democratic congressional leadership has formally labeled Fox News content “propaganda.”
The term is entirely apt. As newly revealed texts from Carlson and other on-air personalities and executives demonstrate, they feared that telling their audience the truth about the 2020 vote could cost them a disastrously high number of viewers.
Instead, Fox News personalities kept lying about it while executives looked the other way..............
But such efforts have been temporary: They have tended to resume appearing on the network and have reverted to treating it as more or less a news channel, albeit a hostile one.
Now, however, it’s becoming clear that interacting with Fox News as a news outlet in any sense is no longer an option for Democrats.
In light of the news that network personalities knowingly deceived viewers about the 2020 election for cynical pecuniary purposes, Democrats plainly have to take on Fox News in a new way. And some of them know it.
“I don’t think we’ve ever had a moment like this, where a major news network has been exposed as deliberately deluding its viewers or readers,” Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) told me. “This is a seminal moment in the history of mass media. And we need to treat it that way.”
But what should that look like?
This week, Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries signaled an aggressive posture in a letter to Fox News founder Rupert Murdoch.
The two New York Democrats demanded that the network get star anchor Tucker Carlson and others to recant their lies about the 2020 election on the air. The letter said:
This might be the first time that the Democratic congressional leadership has formally labeled Fox News content “propaganda.”
The term is entirely apt. As newly revealed texts from Carlson and other on-air personalities and executives demonstrate, they feared that telling their audience the truth about the 2020 vote could cost them a disastrously high number of viewers.
Instead, Fox News personalities kept lying about it while executives looked the other way..............
Link: Finally, Democrats appear ready to wage war on Fox News
Last edited:
SFIDC3
Well-known member
Offline
Unfortunately, the most significant problem isn't FOX news, though I hope they burn to the ground....it's the millions of morons in this country that believe everything they hear from FOX news.....
- Moderator
- #16
Offline
No the problem is your school system which does not teach fact-checking and source analyses. Here you can never get an A on any paper in middle or high school unless you include an evaluation of the sources you use in your papers. It teaches young people critical thinking and that is not something conservatives want.
SFIDC3
Well-known member
Offline
I don't necessarily disagree but it's deeper than that, a lot of folks are raised lets say "far right conservative or radically conservative" and generations of folks believe what they believe because their folks do or did.....I don't think there is much that can change that....
Optimus Prime
Well-known member
Online
A US Federal Election Commission complaint over the collusion of Fox Newswith the Trump campaign in 2020 could be the first of many, the complainant said, amid continued fallout from dramatic court filings in Dominion Voter Systems’ $1.6bn defamation suit against the network.
Media Matters for America, a liberal watchdog, filed its FECcomplaint last week, over the revelation that Rupert Murdoch personally gave Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and adviser, confidential information about a Biden campaign ad.
A progressive political action committee, End Citizens United, also filed a complaint.
As defined by the Harvard Law Review, FEC “campaign finance restrictions do not apply to costs associated with producing news”.
Media Matters alleges that “press exemption” does not apply to Murdoch’s decision to give the Biden ad to Kushner.
Saying the move was “diametrically opposed to Fox Corporation’s regular press activity”, the complaint says: “Fox Corporation, through Murdoch, appears to have engaged in the exact type of campaign activity to which the commission has repeatedly affirmed the press exemption does not apply.
“Therefore, Fox Corporation cannot try to exploit the press exemption to avoid the consequences of making an illegal corporate in-kind contribution.”
The complaint seeks the maximum fine permitted and “appropriate remedial action”……..
www.theguardian.com
Media Matters for America, a liberal watchdog, filed its FECcomplaint last week, over the revelation that Rupert Murdoch personally gave Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and adviser, confidential information about a Biden campaign ad.
A progressive political action committee, End Citizens United, also filed a complaint.
As defined by the Harvard Law Review, FEC “campaign finance restrictions do not apply to costs associated with producing news”.
Media Matters alleges that “press exemption” does not apply to Murdoch’s decision to give the Biden ad to Kushner.
Saying the move was “diametrically opposed to Fox Corporation’s regular press activity”, the complaint says: “Fox Corporation, through Murdoch, appears to have engaged in the exact type of campaign activity to which the commission has repeatedly affirmed the press exemption does not apply.
“Therefore, Fox Corporation cannot try to exploit the press exemption to avoid the consequences of making an illegal corporate in-kind contribution.”
The complaint seeks the maximum fine permitted and “appropriate remedial action”……..
Fox News hit with fresh federal election complaint over Trump camp collusion
Media Matters for America raised issue of Murdoch handing Jared Kushner confidential information about a Biden ad with the FEC
Create an account or login to comment
You must be a member in order to leave a comment
Create account
Create an account on our community. It's easy!
Log in
Already have an account? Log in here.