Captain Jerk & Mr. Spook (1 Viewer)

Users who are viewing this thread

    Flanders

    New member
    Joined
    Dec 5, 2021
    Messages
    1
    Reaction score
    0
    Age
    89
    Location
    New Jersey
    Offline
    Way back when in 1993 when the Maastricht Treaty legitimated the European Union I was convinced the EU would implode in 10 years. I missed the mark by 16 years.

    Britain’s iconic Union Flag was ceremoniously lowered, folded, and taken away in the European Council building in Brussels ahead of Brexit at 11 p.m. on January 31st.

    WATCH: Moment British Flag Comes Down in Brussels – BREXIT DONE
    by Jack Montgomery
    31 Jan 2020

    https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2020/01/31/watch-moment-british-flag-comes-down-in- brussels-brexit-done/

    Removing the Stars & Stripes from U.N. Headquarters is next:

    Sede_de_la_ONU_NY_9.jpg




    The removal should immediately be followed by the Army Corps of Engineers dynamiting this eyesore out of existence before global government hustlers have it designated a historical site.


    Remember this?

    US Space Force logo on left and the Star Trek emblem on right


    The newly unveiled logo for US Space Force appears to have boldly gone where Star Trek went before.

    US Space Force logo looks like one from Star Trek - BBC News
    24 January 2020

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51245262

    Trump should have known better:

    PRC_126008112.jpg


    Why does every new flag have to look like a god awful United Nations flag?



    QUESTION: Did you know that Captain Kirk and Mr. Spock were working for the New World Order crowd? Think about it. They spent most of their time plugging the United Nations! Many Star Trek episodes dealt with omnipotent entities, or they were dirty little morality plays, or just plain silly.

    Plots involving the Klingons, or the Romulans, always ended with Captain Jerk and Mr. Spook bringing off Woodrow Wilson’s Peace Without Victory disgrace. There was never an all-out war with a winner and a loser that I am aware of. Such episodes were loaded with numerous references to the all-supreme United Federation of Planets. Clearly, a clever way of planting the United Nations’ political agenda in the minds of impressionable youngsters. Hell, the fictional Federation even had a flag that looked like the U.N. flag.


    It was no secret that the Star Trek flag was based on the U.N. flag.


    il_fullxfull.1174399715_g27l.jpg





    I wonder how many then-young Trekkies —— now well into their middle-age —— realize how shamelessly they were brainwashed by television propaganda?

    Note that the U.N. is an organization not a government. In any event pass H.R. 204 and the problem is solved:



    Sec 6

    (b) Diplomatic immunity.—No officer or employee of the United Nations (including any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations) or any representative, officer, or employee of any mission to the United Nations of any foreign government shall be entitled to enjoy the privileges and immunities of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of April 18, 1961, nor may any such privileges and immunities be extended to any such individual. The privileges, exemptions, and immunities provided for in the International Organizations Immunities Act of December 29, 1945 (59 Stat. 669; 22 U.S.C. 288 et seq.), or in any agreement or treaty to which the United States is a party, including the agreement entitled “Agreement Between the United Nations and the United States of America Regarding the Headquarters of the United Nations”, signed June 26, 1947 (22 U.S.C. 287 note), and the Convention on Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations, entered into force with respect to the United States on April 29, 1970 (21 UST 1418; TIAS 6900; UNTS 16), shall not apply to the United Nations or to any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations, to the officers and employees of the United Nations, or of any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations, or to the families, suites, or servants of such officers or employees.

    Sec 4

    No funds are authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for assessed or voluntary contributions of the United States to the United Nations or to any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations, except that funds may be appropriated to facilitate termination of United States membership and withdrawal of United States personnel and equipment, in accordance with sections 2 and 3, respectively. Upon termination of United States membership, no payments shall be made to the United Nations or to any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations, out of any funds appropriated prior to such termination or out of any other funds available for such purposes.


    NYC is far more dangerous to this country with or without the United Nations.

    Do you really believe that 185 or so countries would go to war to save worldwide Communism? Most of those countries have no militaries worth mentioning.

    Communist countries would not go to war against the rest of the world to save their United Nations. Even if they did go to war in a last ditch attempt to salvage the U.N. it would be the best thing that could happen to the U.S. and its allies whose combined military strength would make short work of China, North Korea, and Vietnam. Hell, today’s Russia might even side with the U.S. rather than face devastation for the benefit of Chinese Communists.


    NOTE: The United Nations has been after control of the U.S. military since 1945. Even if the global government crowd setup shop somewhere else, passing H.R. 204 this year would effectively put an end to 75 years of their scheming, planning and betrayals. Lets see them fight their wars without the U.S. military.

    Sec 5

    (a) Termination.—No funds are authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for any United States contribution to any United Nations military or peacekeeping operation or force.

    (b) Terminations of United States participation in United Nations peacekeeping operations.—No funds may be obligated or expended to support the participation of any member of the Armed Forces of the United States as part of any United Nations military or peacekeeping operation or force. No member of the Armed Forces of the United States may serve under the command of the United Nations
     
    You think "Removing the Stars & Stripes from U.N. Headquarters is next:"

    I think development of warp drive engines are next.
     
    I think that current events has made the OPs arguments mote. The EU is stronger than ever before due to a certain russian dictator. Nothing unites a quarreling bunch of politicians as an outside threat to their very existence.
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    Back
    Top Bottom