I think the ones about old "classified" or "sealed" records that are now unsealed are the best. They did one not too long ago about some cult or something. but all they did was repeat the original hoax story that was disproven decades ago. Crap, I forgot some specifics, but I really don't...
So, I didnt get to spend enough time looking, but here is a PBS article from last year on Russian news propaganda, and I think it is easy to see aspects of this in the US.https://www.pbs.org/newshour/arts/after-a-week-of-russian-propaganda-i-was-questioning-everythingMy short hand summary...
I omitted Ford and Carter on purpose. I wasn't alive for either of their presidency's.Yes, I think the very public fall (weren't there 2?) And the pardon is what he got crap for. Otherwise, yeah, solid guy.
I find it interesting that you didn't reply to me, but only the ones that it was easier for you to attack back.I tried to give a thoughtful answer to your issue. I even said it has a basis of fact in it. Yet, you didn't further the dialogue.
Maybe a few. It probably stems from Nixon and the bad taste many people had in their mouths from that.Reagan only fell into that category, I thought, during his second term, when you could see he was having problems related to age / brain function.I dont think G HW Bush was a bumbling...
Curbing attacks and snotty behavior is a two way street.I don't know how you do homework on relaying a show you heard. Usually, I hope to find the story later to share or that someone else listened and can fill in the gaps.
Isn't it fair to challenge what someone thinks? Maybe your viewpoint about hyperbole is correct and maybe it isnt. I'd think seeking out more objective truth would be an important endeavor. It is ok to challenge our own assertions.Regarding mt15. Are you challenging her recollection of...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.