The Joe Biden 2020 tracker thread (4 Viewers)

Users who are viewing this thread

    Thats not relevant to this topic. Is she (yes or no) running for president in 2020? People can make a separate topic but it literally has nothing to do with who is running in 2020, which this topic is about

    Maybe.

    For love of God and country, do not be fooled by the demise of the Democrats, their squad of far-left decoys and diversions over the past three years, or the silly notion that Bill and Hillary Clinton are not conniving for the White House again in 2020.


    The Democrats’ 2017 resistance movement, 2018 book tours and 2019 impeachment plot have each been one calculated hoax and political charade after another — all via Clinton design. Make no mistake: Both Clintons are fiendishly in pursuit of Inauguration Day 2021, with Hillary as our next vice president and eventual president.
     
    Washington Times. Good stuff.

    In any event, yes, we're going to keep hearing about HRC, if for no other reason than it's a good excuse not to talk about all the good stuff Trump is doing, of which there's plenty I'm sure.
     
    What? Joe Biden lied about this in front of a national audience in September:


    I assume you meant the one part where he said something like "we didn't put kids in cages." Technically, yes that is wrong. Some kids were housed in the overflow cells built by the Obama administration for at most a couple of days. However, as has been pointed out many times, this was not the policy to house children indefinitely in these overflow cells like it was under Trump -- "indefinitely" meaning in many cases multiple weeks and months -- and separating children from their families before housing them in these overflow cells for multiple weeks and months, which was never done under the Obama administration and was policy under Trump.

    So my point still is also correct -- No, they didn't meaning "Democrats pretended that the "cages" were all Trump's idea and hysterically acted like he was cruel" did not happen. Housing children in cages as a policy and separating children from their parents and then housing those children in cages indefinitely absolutely was Trump's idea (or someone in his administration -- can't give you guys wiggle room to say something like "is there an audio recording of Trump coming up with the idea himself?" or something to that effect), and continuing to do it as a policy for months and months after it was pointed out what was occurring is also only a Trump administration thing. People never admonished the Trump admin for building the cages -- it was the policy of housing separated children in those cages indefinitely that was the issue, no matter how many Republicans try to spin it other ways to deflect.
     
    If Bill were a Republican, Hillary might have been a nicer lady.

    He would have been too busy banging her to be chasing tail. Republicans can’t quit Ms Rodham.

    This thread is like Brokeback Bengazhi.
     
    Nevada prediction

    Bernie - 36
    Pete - 18
    Warren - 18
    Biden - 12
    Klob - 10
    Steyer - 4
     
    Yes. The non-denial from the Bloomberg camp and the fact that the Drudge "bombshell" was delivered right after the NYT and Post had articles detailing Bloomberg's sexist comments and shady philanthropy network.


    See here lies the problem. When you get you BOMBSHELL news from the likes of the utterly pathetic Drudge report or any of the click bait news sights left or right and take it as news is the problem.

    News aggregators are not news sites bloggers are just bloggers.
     
    Maybe.




    I just love you post crap as news from a Moonie news paper!

    That crap was founded by Sun Myung Moon.

    Thanks I needed a chuckle this morning.

    So how do you feel about the moonies?
     
    Hah, you guys can forget us dropping HRC anytime soon.

    You gifted her to us, and we are not giving her back.

    BTW, just this past week the guy who has spent 430MM trying to get the Democratic nomination floated the idea that he would choose her as VP. She is very active in this election cycle. So, get used to it.
    Well, of course, it’s literally ALL you have to talk about
     
    Hah, you guys give us so much ro talk about that we actually have to hold back.
    We don't want to be like Steve Spurrier and run up the score
    How about 1 score?
    Give us 1 verifiable, intellectually honest ‘win’ altconservative has had since, let’s say, the tea party that you can hang your hat on
     
    I am very leery about having a nine-year-old become the focus of a media circus about Buttigeg's sexuality.
    An old political axiom asks, "Yes, but how will it play in Peoria?"
    Not well, would be my guess.

    1582491978084.png

    Denver, Colorado (CNN)Pete Buttigieg shared an emotional moment with a young supporter in Denver on Saturday night.
    "Thank you for being so brave," the boy, later identified as 9-year-old Zachary Ro, wrote in a question submitted via fishbowl during the presidential hopeful's Saturday rally, "Would you help me tell the world I'm gay, too? I want to be brave like you."

     
    I am very leery about having a nine-year-old become the focus of a media circus about Buttigeg's sexuality.

    Its funny, when I first saw this on the news, my first immediate thought was that conservatives were going to spin this in some manner. My guess was that this was an actor, planted there to push the "liberal agenda." You know, standard conspiracy theory stuff.
     
    Its funny, when I first saw this on the news, my first immediate thought was that conservatives were going to spin this in some manner. My guess was that this was an actor, planted there to push the "liberal agenda." You know, standard conspiracy theory stuff.

    Was it only me who noticed the Iowa caucus-goer who wanted to rescind her vote after learning Pete's gay?
    Someone invested enough to go through the whole caucus crapshow A: Didn't know he's gay and B: Wouldn't vote for him based on that alone.
    Yeah, sad to say, but Pete has no chance nationally.
     
    Was it only me who noticed the Iowa caucus-goer who wanted to rescind her vote after learning Pete's gay?
    Someone invested enough to go through the whole caucus crapshow A: Didn't know he's gay and B: Wouldn't vote for him based on that alone.
    Yeah, sad to say, but Pete has no chance nationally.

    What I really wanted to know was if she knew he was a democrat. She couldn't possibly have come across more as a character from an SNL spoof of a Trump rally. Everything about it was just bizarro world.
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    Advertisement

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Sponsored

    Back
    Top Bottom